A call to Reason and Civility . . .

I don't believe any reasonably well-informed American would deny that we live in a highly ideologically polarized social culture. As a result, many of us hold opinions and beliefs (political, theological, etc.) in diametric opposition to some of those close to us; and we may, frequently or occasionally, engage in dialog with those close to us, by which we seek to explain our position to them, with the tacit hope that our 'friend(s)' will somehow experience an ideological epiphany, and will thus see the inherent and obvious truth in what we believe. 

Amazingly, our friend(s) have an identical perspective and tacit hope from their 'perverted' point of view. 

So, I guess the real question is: how do we determine who is right?

I haven't a clue; but, in the interest of engendering productive dialog, I've learned a few things over the years. One of which is this: Any argument or discussion that begins with words similar to, "I don't know how you can be so fucking stupid!" is not likely to yield useful results.

I submit the following as a guideline for discussion, dialog, and debate. Employ it as you see fit. 

It is my fervent hope that any readers moved to comment on posts and opinions found on this blog will pay journalistic homage to the wisdom of Messrs. Novak and Niebuhr.

______________________________

From an essay by Michael Novak 

(one very sharp hombre - check him out).

. . . "In this new era of mutual respect, even passionate arguments should be conducted with civility. I urge all of you to argue clearly, to argue politely, and to argue with respect for those who most disagree with you.

Let us continue to reason together, not necessarily to end all disagreement, but at least to gain greater insight into the force of the argument of those with whom we disagree the most.

Let me close with the aphorism attributed by some to Reinhold Niebuhr: 'Always remember that there is some truth in your opponent's error, and some error in your own truth.'"